Sunday, May 23, 2010
LOST: Last Minute Predictions
DEAD ( or forgotten) PEOPLE
Of course we're going to see old friends tonight here's some I think will be popping up.
Walt
Shannon
Boone
Rose
Bernard
Juliet
Charlie
Mr. Eko (?)
Vincent the dog
Frank
Charlotte
Daniel
Mrs. Hawking
and probably a lot of other secondary characters.
VOLCANO
The main reason I mention this is becaue of them mention it's importance inthe podcasts.
I'm thinking the ultimate demise of the MIB may have to be by shoving him into the volcano (a la LOTR).
It would make sense due to the vocalic ash they used to place in circles to protect them. Plus, he was created by being shoved down a hole full of light.. why not destroy him by shoving him down a hole of fire?
Either that, or he may try to shove Desmond into the light (or the volcano) in order to destroy the island.
Either way I'd like to see them be true to their word and bring back the volcano.
JACK'S (FS) EX-WIFE
She's going to be at the concert (also where I think the Losties will coincedentally all be at, at the same time)
I'm betting on it being Juliet. JUst saying, it would make sense.
FRANK?
No one has yet to mention that Frank never escaped form the sub or is dead. I liked Frank. Can we please show a little respect. I'm guessing that'll be address finally in some way. Either he surprises us by being alive (!) or someone realizes they miss him. Either way I kinda hope we see him in the Flash Sideways.
ENDING?
I can't decide if I think that they'll kill the MIB and they can go about their merry way (as it were) or if there wil be a NEW MIB; in which case Jack and New MIB (Sawyer?) are left to carry on the ways of the island.
FLASH SIDEWAYS
It has to resolve somehow. I think they're goign to merge in some unified universe somehow. I'm not sure how that makes sense. That or the characters have to choose to give up this "better" life for the one they lived on the island. Which shows them all having to make a scarifice.
DESMOND
He's going to be playing a big role. Will he live? I hope so.
Anyway. that's all I really got just wanted to make a last minute stab at the finale.
Sit back and enjoy. It'll all be over soon. :)
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
LOST: The Package; Happily Ever After; Everybody Loves Hugo
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
LOST: Ab Aeterno & Recon
(if you only have time to read one section I suggest you scroll down to “THE ISLAND IS (NOT) THE CORK”) But seriously this is a good post this time. worth the full read.
SAWYER IS A COP
Although I'm trying to adopt this new format to bullet point revelations... I really didn't see a whole lot in “Recon”. The biggest thing is that Sawyer is a cop in the FS. Once again showing an “alternate” decision than the one in the Original timeline. This will obviously play into how the two timelines reconcile, but as of right now it's very similar to the first few episodes of the season....they are set-ups for later payoffs. In the LOST podcast, however, they did confirm that we will see more of Cop sawyer and his story... presumably regarding the capture of Kate.
THEY GREW UP THE SAME
Despite the fact that the bomb detonated in the FS and changed the course of “history” for our LOSTies, major life events still happened. Sawyer's parents are both dead by the same means (conned by Locke's Dad.. Anthony Copper) and Charlotte is still an archeologist. Does that mean she is still looking for the island that she was born on? Or does she know that it is at the bottom of the ocean?
Can Miles still talk to dead people?
CLAIRE IS EF-ing CRAZY
Yep.
CROSS-OVERS
We are seeing more and more characters cross over into each-others FS story. Now we're even seeing minor characters and long-forgotten characters show up. Charlotte was obviously in the FS of Sawyer.. but so was Liam, Charlies brother. Remember in the FS Jack saved Charlie from choking on his stash of drugs and Charlie ended up being taken away in custody. Liam, I guess, is trying to locate him. Does that mean Charlie is missing/ has escaped?
THE SMOKE MONSTER HATES HIS MOMMY
My favorite scene of the whole episode is when Locke was talking to Kate.
Personally, I believe what he said to Kate about his past..about him having some crazy mother and that having great impact on how he got where he is. I'm guessing that we will probably get to see his flashback before the end of the series to shed some further light on the subject. I also like the parallel drawn about Aaron and Claire. There was an early theory that the whole show came down to the fact that the island wanted Aaron to be it's new leader and that he was very special and he was to be the key to all the mysteries. I think that was debunked by the writers...but even if they didn't deny it directly, he's really not a part of the show so I'd hate to see him somehow magically flown back to the island at the last minute to be the answer. None-the-less, the scene does paint a very cautious warning for the future of Aaron and Claire (See: CLAIRE IS EF-ing CRAZY)
SAWYER THINKS HE'S SOOOOOO SMART
Sawyer is pretty clever. By the end of this episode he's made a deal with Locke and Widmore. Told them both the truth and just waiting for them to be distracted enough to escape. BUT, he's made deals with them so if either of them “win” he figures he'll get his reward of getting off the island either way.
Really? Do you think it'll be that simple? You're just gonna run off in a submarine while everyone's back is turned...or these chronic liars will hold up their end of the deal? I don't think so. So, it'll be interesting to see how this plays out and who will catch Sawyer's hand in the proverbial cookie jar...and what will those consequences be. Is he going to drag Kate down with him and then ultimately choose to sacrifice himself for her freedom (again)? Probably.
ASSUMPTIONS MAKE A “U KNOW WHAT” OUTTA “U KNOW WHO”
Truthfully, this is probably nothing.. but when a character makes an assumption, it always throws up a red flag for me. Mainly because that is the same time the audience will make the same assumption.. and that's the time the writers throw in a curve ball to surprise us. What I'm speaking of is the deal that Sawyer made with Widmore. Sawyer basically marches down to the sub and says “I know you want to kill Locke”. Widmore never actually confirms that. He just agrees to get sawyer off the island if he brings Locke to the hydra station. Once there, Widmore's purpose for the smoke monster could be any number of things. To me that is a red flag for a plot twist.
That being said, I don't think that Widmore and Locke are on the same side. I think the theory of Ben and Widmore both being on Jacob's side has a lot more evidence and weight to it. But I guess that too doesn't mean that Widmore is on Jacob's side for the same reasons Ben is. Perhaps Widmore is conning Jacob and wants to try to Harness the smoke monster's power somehow. Maybe that's why Ben and Widmore fought so much. Because they had different views on what to do with the evil that was on the island. Kill it, or use it for their own means? There is definitely a complex relationship between these 4 people that has yet to be unfolded.
WHAT'S BEHIND DOOR #2?
There's a securely locked door on the sub holding something secret. Is this like the “magic box” that brought Anthony Copper to the island? If Widmore is not (108) Wallace, then is Wallace being held captive by Widmore? Maybe it's Desmond.. for some reason. Or MAYBE it's the Smoke monsters mom, brought back as a bargaining chip or hostage used for whatever plans Widmore has for Smokey.
SAYID IS A MURDEROUS VEGETABLE
If he's not killing people, he's just sitting there watching other people getting attacked (See: CLAIRE IS EF-ing CRAZY)
RICHARD IS OLD
I'm not really going to say too much about Richards flash back as it pertains to Richard. I think it was pretty self explanatory. It showed us where he came from and how he go to the island. The MIB tried to manipulate him into joining his cause (of killing Jacob) but ultimately joined with Jacob. It confirmed my theories then that Richard was indeed a slave on the black rock and was basically given a choice as to which side he would be on. There were obvious symbols used through out the episode as in Richards baptism and communion. So basically, we now know who Richard is. Great.
THE ARGUMENT
Since last season's finale we've known that this MIB and Jacob have been having an argument and that Jacob has been trying to prove him wrong. I theorized that it had something to do with that nature of man... in this episode we see that is more or less the case. The MIB “believes everyone can be corrupted because it is in their nature to be bad and that (Jacob) brings people here to prove the Man in Black wrong. Great! That kind of answers why the Losties are there. It doesn't answer WHY Jacob thinks they have the ability to prove the MIB wrong, but it shows us why they are there (or at least one reason why). So we know that, for a long time, Jacob's motivation is to prove the MIB wrong and that the MIB's motivation is to kill Jacob/ get off the island.
“IT ONLY ENDS ONCE”
Speaking of proving the MIB wrong. In the season 5 finale the MIB is frustrated by Jacobs continued bringing of people to the island. He says, “they come, they fight, they corrupt. It's always ends the same”. Jacob replies “it only ends once. Everything else before that is just progress”
OK. So I'm assuming the “it” is the fight that they're having. Well, now we know what the fight is. It is the belief that everyone can be corrupted. So, from the MIB perspective, it is easy to discern how it can end just once..if he manages to kill Jacob and gets off the island.. then he's free. It's over. The end. But what about from Jacob's perspective? Say he proves that a man, ONE man, is not corruptible. Then what? How does that end the argument? Is it over when the MIB agrees with Jacob and they become best friends as the MIB turns over a new leaf and all is good in the world? I don't think the MIB would be so easily convinced. Have we not seen some good people stand true and not be corrupted? Hell, Richard chose to be with Jacob rather than kill him. Or is that negated because Jacob interacted with him rather than Richard having to merely believe in him blindly. Perhaps. So then we're waiting for somehow to have blind, incorruptible faith. John Locke fit that bill. Too bad he got conned by the MIB into dying. So perhaps the MIB saw that Locke proved Jacob right and rather than accepting it, used it to gain access to Jacob and kill him. So apparently ONE uncorrupted man wasn't enough. Does that mean the MIB would never be convinced. That would mean the protection of the island over the MIB would have to go on forever. Unless the MIB can be “killed” and that's how Jacob intended to end it.
THE ISLAND IS (NOT) THE CORK
I love the metaphor of the bottle. In it the MIB, the evil, is the wine...held captive in the bottle by the cork(the island). Although I'm SURE the writers were very deliberate in this metaphor and the words they chose to describe it's relationship to the people involved, I think I would phrase it different.
Let's say the wine is still the MIB, but instead Jacob is the cork and BOTTLE, itself, is the island. To me it is much more a one-to-one comparison. The wine is IN the bottle, trapped by the cork. The MIB is ON the island trapped there by Jacob. Aside from that, it also makes for a revealing tell at the end of the episode.
At the end we see Jacob pass the corked bottle of wine to the MIB as he says “here. Something for you to pass the time.” I don't think Jacob was thinking the MIB should get drunk and pass out. Jacob meant it more as a logic puzzle. Have you ever had one of those wooden or metal twisting puzzles where you have to get the ring out of the knot of stings or get the ball into the top of the glass..or something of the sort. Well that's what this is.. how do you get the wine out, around the cork? You don't. You do what the MIB did and break the bottle. He didn't break the bottle because he was upset because he wanted white wine. He was being poetic, or symbolic.. he's going to “break” the friggin' island. Hence, why I think my metaphor is a little bit better. Notice he didn't break the bottle at the top where the cork (Jacob) is...he broke it at the bottom. In essence if he can't get around Jacob (even if he is dead) he's going to escape via the “back door”. That back door will open once he has destroyed the island..what do you think he's creating a war for? He has to destroy the island!. or at least anything that would retain it's captive powers.
Quick PODCASTS REVEALS
Here's some things they've mentioned in the podcasts, but I really don't want to speculate on
-The volcano is still relevant and it's involvement is still “size-mic”. (perhaps a hint at an eruption)
-Jacob may or may not have the ability to change appearance like Smokey.
-Libby will be in the mix again at some point
-Desmond episode is coming (next week)
-MIB is still potentially the good guy (although I seriously doubt it)
-Smokey's ability to shape shift (on and off the island) vs. Hurley's ability to see dead people. When was which one which will be addressed. (Namely... Hurley's invisible friend, Dave)
-How the package was dropped on the island will be addressed in some fashion (although I thought it was already answered)
-Annie was just Annie
-MIB plays on the idea that if you THINK the island isn't real, then you can be manipulated to do evil. (hence telling everyone they're already dead and in hell)
BEFORE THEY WERE JACOB AND THE MIB
I'm not going to spend time elaborating on this because I don't know if it hold any water.. but I'm going to just throw out the idea that Jacob and the MIB were not the FIRST Jacob and MIB. Or at the very least they weren't always in that form or in those bodies. The MIB mentioned to Kate that Jacob took his body and he also had a life before he was on the island.. a mother. So was this whole “body taking” metaphoric or is he being literal. Did Jacob take the MIB's ACTUAL body and thus MIB is reduced to being smoke and taking the form of other people... is this why the killing of Jacob locked the MIB into LOCKE's form. Was Jacob formally a MIB himself? Did they both arrive on the island to take the place of other people in the same roles? Some, or all, of this might be possible.
BLACK AND WHITE ROCKS
We're starting to see the black and white rocks pop up. Mainly between Jacob and the MIB as part of their “inside joke” These are similar to the rocks found with Adam and Eve (yes.. my favorite mystery). Is it possible that Adam and Eve were the former Jacob and MIB. If my above theory is at all true it might be feasible. Perhaps the former good and evil persons had this thing with rocks representing equating to the balance of power. And when Jacob and the MIB arrived on the island to take their places they learned of this. Then, for whatever reason, their predecessors died, leaving Jacob and MIB to take on their new roles. Adam and Eve were buried in the caves with their rocks. Later on as a “joke” Jacob taunted the MIB with the white rock to show that he was in power (as seen in the last episode). And the MIB hates jokes.
THIS IS A SHOW ABOUT CHARACTERS
So you may be disappointed by “The End”.
I think a lot of the fans are wrapped up in the mysteries and the “answers”. I'm confident that the show is going to wrap up nicely. However even Darlton says that there will be smaller (inconsequential) mysteries left partially open. The key word of all that is “inconsequential”....meaning it doesn't really matter. They're telling this story about characters...and although I fear many will feel cheapened out of the results of the show.. when rewatching the series, I hope we can all see the build up of the characters is what made the pay off so great. I can already hear people yammering about “what was the meaning of Geronimo Jackson? Was that really Emilia Earhart? What was the significance of BLANK?”
And it doesn't matter. We now (mostly) know why they're here (See: THE ARGUMENT). What's great is, really, that this is the same question we, as the audience, have been asking ourselves for 6 seasons. Not so much “is everyone corruptible”, but more specifically.. IS Sawyer a good guy, despite being a con man? Is Jack non-redeemable despite being a life saving doctor? Has Kate really done wrong in only trying to protect who she loves? We've already seen some amazing flip-flopping among characters. Jack is now a Man of faith despite being a complete skeptic.. but will his faith hold? Innocent little Claire has been driven to obsession (See: CLAIRE IS EF-ing CRAZY), the original John Locke... who was 100% faith and had belief in his destiny, got duped by the MIB (“the devil”) into killing himself for the benefit of “evil”. So in this world, even that strong, blind faith led him astray. So who is redeemed for their sins. Who chooses to go to which side? I know I am rooting for certain characters to be good and potentially to even be “heroes” (but not like the show HEROES, cuz that show sucks). I don't believe Jacob is a god. So HE is waiting for these answers and rooting for people just as much as we are. Remember that Miles said Jacob's last thought about Ben was “ I hope I was wrong about you”. THAT'S THE SAME THOUGHT I'M HAVING AS AN AUDIENCE MEMBER. We want to love certain characters.. we even want to hate certain characters, but because of there complicated lives and backstories.. we don't know what to think. Everyone is a little bit good and little bit bad (hey, just like real life) and that's why we connect to these characters and that's why we want certain ones to succeed..because we see ourselves in them. Not that the following would REALLY happen but imagine that you're an average Joe (in real life) and your faced with an issue. Normally you may be selfish and underhanded with the decision (much like sawyer the con man), but you think back and say “hey, if after all sawyer did, he is still redeemable as a person, then maybe I am too.” And maybe your good side starts to shine a little more in hopes of forgiveness like we (as an audience) have seen Sawyer for the sacrifices he's made for others. That may be a cheesy, ideal example.. but I don't think it's impossible.
In today's society (filled with corruption, lies, betrayal, and uncertainty by many of our political and social leaders) we lack heroes or roles models. If you look at the film business, no longer are people flocking to see movies starring WHATS-HIS-NAME, they're flocking to see stories about CHARACTERS!. Batman, Robin Hood, Iron Man, even Twilight. They're all about complex characters with both a light side and a dark side. We've realized that the actors playing them are no better than us (the average Joe) as people, so we instead idolize the characters themselves. And as always (as I believe) movies help dictate the zeitgeist of generations and if we're watching these complex CHARACTERS make difficult decisions (hopefully the right decisions as well), then we as people who relate to them, are empowered to make those same decisions... and we do so because the characters have gone through as much “crap” as we have in life and we LIKE them in ways we want others to like us..
So Ultimately, in LOST...in the battle of good and evil, it's not about what the island IS, it's about the characters and the decisions they make that lead to their redemption (forgiveness) or lack thereof. Their path to redemption is our path to redemption. Their success is our success. I may be blowing this up a bit, but you'd be surprised how much simple TV characters can influence a person's behavior. If you don't believe me look back at fashion, hair styles, and common vernacular over the past 20 years and see how much of it was directly influenced over a popular character.
So all I'm saying is.. enjoy the rest of the series for the changes the characters are going through, not just for the mysteries that are revealed. (This is why the Ben episodes are usually the best.. they have been very character heavy....and well performed).
TONIGHT
It's a Sun/Jin episode tonight. So look for Sun having to make her decision about being corrupted. Will she give in to the temptation to join Jin and take sides with Locke, or will she be strong in her faith of Jacob and work to get Jin back to her side?
Monday, March 15, 2010
Dr. Linus (and other stuff)
The previous episodes (The Substitute, Lighthouse, Sundown) were good but I thought that they all shared a similar dilemma. They were all setups to bigger solutions.
Now I know that you're going to say that has been the case for every episode in the past 5 seasons. You'd mostly be right. BUT, when then comparing those episode to the most recent Dr. Linus, I think you can see the narrative difference.
Before I elaborate on that , let's catch up on the previous 3 episodes and talk briefly about what we learned. The FS of these 3 episodes (like all episodes this season) showed us an “alternate” (although I've previously talked about how Darlton says it's not really an alternate timeline, but let's use that word anyway) life of our Losties sans island. I think the main thing we see out of these is that our Losties continue to cross paths despite no longer having the connection of the Island to tie them together. What does this mean? That's the BIG question. So these interactions merely alert us to the fact that there IS a bigger question yet to be answered. I'm glad that there are these interactions. Imagine if we didn't see that. Then we would just watch these characters go about their normal life believing that strange things were no longer happening to them. But coincidences are still happening. So there is still meaning to them.
Darlton said that they wanted this season to mimic and feel like the first season a lot. I think this is a complete success. Now were are looking at new stories that we have no idea how they fill into a bigger picture.
In the first season it was the same thing. Not only were the FB giving us insight into the characters, they began to fill up with overlapped stories of other people and other coincidences of the island. Of course, back in Season 1, it would have been impossible to predict all the stuff that happened or what the meaning of all this is, but we knew it mattered. Again, the same goes for the FS this season.
Aside from knowing that these FS have significance, there are only a few things stick out to me as interesting factors.
Jack has a son. Again, how big of a deal is this? I really don't know. It's simply showing a different side of Jack. However, the producers have said that the mother of the child is someone we already know and is NOT his ex-wife from the original timeline. My bet is on Juliet.
Locke is still talking to his father and is still paralyzed. Considering that his father cause his condition originally, you'd thing that something else would have happened to put Locke in a wheelchair. So what was it?
Sayid still kills people.
There are other things that are note worthy. Helen is still with Locke (remember that she dies of cancer in 2006 in the original timeline. It is currently 2004 in the FS). Nadia marries Sayids brother despite her feelings for Sayid. Jack has apparently recovered from alcoholism (or at least the threat of it).
These are all details that we will only learn the significance of once we learn how the two timelines reconcile..much like in season 1.
OK...let's get to the island. The stuff on island was the most interesting to me. In the substitute Locke begins recruiting. He starts with Sawyer as predicted. Other things happen like seeing a boy in the woods. Young Jacob? Of course the biggest part of this is the reveal of the numbers in the Cave at the end.
HEY! We learn that the numbers correspond to Losties. 4-Lock 8-Hurley 15- Sawyer 16 –Sayid 23- Jack 42 – Jin and/or Sun 51- Kate. Of course 51 is not apart of the original sequence and with Locke being crossed out now, does that change the importance of different numbers in terms of the Island as well as Dharma's Valenzetti equation?
The MIB is defiantly manipulating sawyer to get to his side and it works. He claims he doesn't believe the island needs to be protected form anything (but then later tells Ben hat he needs someone to replace Jacob to protect the island)
....................................................
(So as I was writing this I realized it's going to take forever to type out the reasoning and connective tissue between all these things. So I'm calling an audible and adopting a new format. I'm going to speak of significant points and revelations that I have during these episodes, rather than try to point out all the parallels of storytelling that the writers make. Because, really, if you investigate and can remember older episodes....they are everywhere!! Which is why I love this show so much. But I don't have time to write all that and you don't have time to read it.)
Piecing things together from SUNDOWN.
Dogen says that every man has a scale (Sayid's tipped the wrong way). I believe that the MIB and Jacob are opposite sides of the same scale that represents the scale of man as a whole. If not MAN (as in the whole world) then maybe the scale of the island...and depending on which way the island is tipped, it gives way to either peace or destruction throughout the rest of the world.
Ben is good.
'Dr. Linus' was his redemption story. I believe he was always working for Jacob (or thought he was working for Jacob) even when he was doing bad things. It was all in the name of the Island. But in the FS we see, although he is manipulative, that he is still good and can choose to put others ahead of him. Also we see that he chooses to go back with Ilana after he is invited rather than still fleeing to Locke because it was his only choice.(basically choosing good over evil)
Widmore is also good. Maybe.
Darlton said in their last podcast that it wouldn't be impossible to think that Widmore and Ben were on the same side. I have suggested this in the past, but with little evidence, However, after seeing Ben's redemption (and I believe true colors) I think it more likely then ever. Widmore could still be bad, but, like Ben, I think he was trying to do everything in the name of the island. It's like to kids fighting over their parent's affection. They both just wanted to be loved by Jacob more. And they both wanted to be in charge. They just fought over it all the time. But if they were both giving a gift by Jacob (like Richard Alpert and our Losties) then it would explain why they can't kill each other. They may still have it out for eachother, but ultimately I think they are fighting on the same side.
Jack is now a man of faith.
It's a great turn of events. Locke (as the MIB) doesn't believe the island needs to be protected because it's all malarkey. Jack, who went from thinking this was all crap, now sees that he was called to the island for a purpose. A purpose he's always wanted to have. And out of his faith of that belief, he risked blowing himself up. He seems hell bent on achieving his purpose now... a motivation the island has been trying to get him to realize since day one.
Richard Alpert was originally a slave on the Black Rock.
Who was he a slave to? I'm not sure. Maybe an ancestor of Widmore. I'll be curious to see his story unfold when he gets an episode next week. It seems like he has met with Jacob and the MIB upon his arrival. Almost as if he was given a choice between the two.
Is Sawyer really bad or is he conning the MIB?
His episode is this week, so we'll see. I predicted that he would end up on the MIB's side but not sure for what reason. There's going to be great implications of the relationships on the past.
Locke as a non-believer will be fighting Jack as a man of faith, now. Kate is trapped on Lockes side right now, a place she doesn't want to be. Jack had a child with Juliet, (the woman sawyer truly loved) in the FS, which will somehow reconcile with the Island timeline. Kate is torn between Jack who she loved off the island and Sawyer who she still has deep, unfulfilled feelings for.I don't know. If Sawyer's calmer side doesn't prevail, I could see him having it out for Jack.
Between the two timelines Jack will have been with the two women Sawyer loved. Kate and Juliet. Once those timelines “merge” (or whatever they're going to do) he is going to be jealous and pissed off.
Hurley is the interim leader.
He's the only one that is talking to Jacob. I believe he has always been there because he is faithful and good. But really he lacks some of those core skills to oversee the island. Also he's sequentially next in line after Locke...according to the numbers.
Wallace is 108.
According to the dial in the Lighthouse we see a glimpse of the name Wallace (crossed out) on the dial. This is the person that Jacob said was coming to the island. It would appear that Jacob wants him to come there (seeing as how he wanted to use the lighthouse to draw him in). Is this Wallace person actuality Widmore? I think that's likely. Perhaps Wallace was a old family name that he changed or Widmore is a fake name he gave everyone else (like Sawyer). This further supports the theory that Widmore is on Jacob's side. It would make sense that the name is crossed out, too, because Widmore was the leader and then was banished. Much like on the dial and on the cave walls, we see familiar names crossed out of people that are no longer on the island.
Volcano still important
Darlton confirmed that the volcano that was mentioned briefly in the past (as well as the volcanic-like ash that is around) will have more importance, or at least be brought up again in this final season.
That's all that I can think of for now. I'm sure I forgot something.
But look for more next week.. likely in this new simplified format.
I hope you like Dr. Linus as much as I did. If not I wish I had time to tell you why it was a very successful episode. Looking forward to more Sawyer this week.
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
LOST: What Kate Does
Probably a short post today. I've been putting this off in hopes that ABC would put up a podcast this week. It looks like that will not happen so I'm moving on with my own thoughts.
The episode is called “What Kate Does” which is a play of off an episode in Season 2 called “What Kate Did”. In the FS we see what happens as Kate escapes form the airport with Claire being forced along with her. To me there are really only a few things that are of blinding curiosity to me.
In general there are more occurrences of things in this timeline that appeared in the original timeline. For example, the toy whale that Kate finds in Claire's bag is the same toy that Aaron held in the Flash Forwards. Ethan is there just as he was on the island, although this time he is not trying to steal the baby (yet). Kate helps get Claire to the hospital where she will be able to give birth to Aaron. In the original timeline Kate was the one that helped Aaron be born in the jungle. It's curious that Claire was given the choice to have the baby now or wait awhile. She chose to wait. This was an option she didn't have back on the island. I wonder if we will see any significant effects of that different decision.
There are of course slight differences that are appearing in the FS. AS I mentioned Ethan is there but obviously not all crazy for abducting Claire. However, instead of being Ethan Rom, his name is Ethan Goodspeed. We already know that Ethan was the child of Horace Goodspeed and his wife Amy.
Presumably that is still true and hence why they have the same last name. But that begs the question why his name was Ethan Rom back on the island.
In my last post I theorized that perhaps Flight 815 of the FS timeline and the current events on the island are on the same timeline. Although I can't recall hearing the exact year the current on-island events are happening, I think it's okay to assume it's 2007 (or 2008) not 2004. So Iwas thinking that Flight 815 in the FS was actually happening in 2007. But in this episode on Claire's sonogram we are able to see the date 10-22-04. This raises questions in two ways. First off, the original flight 815 was on 9-22-04. So at least my theory of the flight not happening on the same, original day may be correct.....or perhaps not. You see, Gregg Nations, who is a co-producer and script coordinator for LOST, answered a fan question posted on famous LOST website, The Fuselage. Regarding this inconsistency.
(click for larger version)
The fan asked “The date on the top right corner is 10-22-04. Prop error or hidden clue?”
Gregg responded “Ah, it's a little combination of both. Two numbers are correct, and one number is a mistake. Can you guess which is which?”
He went on to say that it is NOT “10 as the clue and 04 as the mistake”.
So where does that leave us. I really don't know. But I I'm finding comfort that my theory may not have been completely wrong. I figured Darlton wanted us to assume that everything in the FS was happening at the same time...and whenever you assume something with LOST is when they usually throw you a curve ball.
Back on the island we're pretty much left to deal with the question “What the EF is going on with Sayid?” We see Jack make a huge scene about giving him the pill..blah blah blah. Jack being Jack. What was really interesting to me is not so much that the pill was poison...I mean really, I don't think anyone expected it to be homemade NyQuil for Sayid. It was either some SUPER magical potion (which would have been cool) or it was Poison. Well, it was poison. I'm not surprised or offended by the Other's (specifically Dogen's) attempt to poison Sayid. I mean they say he's infected and presumably evil and dangerous now. At first I wondered if the poison would have outright killed Sayid or if would just vanquish what ever it is that is claiming him. Taking poison and only have it kill part of you is something out of the end of Fight Club, and kind of a cheap way to keep a character on a show (*coughHEROEScough*). So I think assuming Sayid would die is okay.. although I'm only about 90% sure of that.
Of Course Jack did not give Sayid the pill so maybe we'll never know...and that's okay.
I like this because I think we're going to see what happens throughout the process of being infected. This is what happened to Rousseau's team and what has happened to Claire (according to Dogen). I think Sayid will eventually escape and join forces with Locke.
This is a great way to shed light on the events of the past in a non-flashback. The process of becoming infected, I think, is in-effect the idea of turning to the dark-side. It may not be voluntary but it still happens. I love if this starts to happen because we will now see our characters take sides for the “battle of good and evil” Those infected will be on the dark side, and those not will be on the good side (allegedly Jacob's side at this point).
If we take a look at the sides now, we have as the possiblyInfected: Locke, Claire, Sayid, and Christian (although he may somehow have represented both sides at one point) as well as Ben and Sun who may now be enslaved to the Fake Locke. Sawyer will be tempted by Locke to join him in this next episode (but will Sawyer do it?????) and if Jin is captured by Claire he may have no choice but to join them. On the good side we have faithful Hurley, Jack, and Miles as well as Ilana and Richard (if they, too, can avoid being enslaved by Locke).
So It'll be a good fight. Pitting friends vs friends. Remember that Kate only came back for Claire..what will happen when she's forced to fight her in some way..Or Jin has to oppose Sun..or any other relationship that can be strained. Should be good.
The last question then is, more specifically, WHAT is infecting Sayid? Is it the smoke monster? Would that even be possible since he (as Locke) was no where near the temple. I don't think it's the Smoke monster that “claimed” him, but perhaps it's more of the essence of the moster. The non-tangible evil that the monster is apparently a part of and has the ability to claim people.. in more of a spiritual sense. I'm not entirely sure and I don't think we'll get the answer to that all at once. I think that'll be something we see develop as we see how the infection takes over Sayid.
Anyway, that's about all I got this week. I think tonight's episode will be rally good and am hoping for another podcast to shed some light on these discussions. Stayed tuned for another post coming later this week.
Thanks for reading.